Non Mihi Non Tibi Sed Nobis

Permalink Reply by Akh Zion on March 21, 2010 at 11:38pm
Permalink Reply by Frater BC on March 27, 2010 at 8:22pm
Permalink Reply by Adivinator on September 9, 2010 at 8:47pm
Permalink Reply by Frater B.G on November 5, 2010 at 6:44am
Permalink Reply by Frater B.G on November 5, 2010 at 10:47am
Permalink Reply by Frater BC on November 7, 2010 at 6:13pm
Permalink Reply by john shoemaker on March 2, 2012 at 10:43pm Is anyone interested in discussing Suares' definitions of the A-T? Or reviewing a development of BRASYT 1:1 using his definitions and a Heb/Eng thesaurus?
Permalink Reply by john shoemaker on March 5, 2012 at 8:57pm carlo.suares.cabala.weebly.com basics for discussion
Permalink Reply by john shoemaker on March 8, 2012 at 7:12pm After years of reading Cypher and Heb/Eng distionarys I accepted what he wrote that the Hieroglyphs were elements of thought. Like Bayt is a concept, a label for a group of similar things. Something is either in the mental container or not. Dictionary gives "in" as one of significances. The sixth one is the interfertilizing ability. one concept can interfertilize with another. All humans have this "and"ability. I agree with Suares that there was an "opening" of these definitions in the 60s--to him and a few others. Opening because these definitions are hidden those who support the power in belief of a magic male who ordered nationalistic deeds.
Torah begins with an explanation of how the soul operates. The thinking machine produces little visions in the imagination. Memory In carlo-suares-cabala.weebly.com there is my take on BRASYT1:1 and psyche.com has a well constructed 3row by 9column matrix of the AT and definitions given to Suares. Suares doesn't appear to have spent time with a Heb/Engor French dictionary-thesaurus. I can't find a discussion anywhere. We're it.
© 2012 Created by Akh Zion.